Their Motives Are Suspect

Martin concedes but is still worried about voter integrity:

Still, Martin offered criticism for Russ’ sister, Secretary of State Robin Carnahan, whose office maintains a voter database that went offline during part of Election Day.

Martin also questioned why the St. Louis Board of Election — of which he was once chairman — hired a private security firm that had once done work for Russ Carnahan’s campaign. (The firm, Special Services, is hired frequently to provide protection at political events.)

Though the election is over, Martin said he will continue to “in the coming weeks and days…to highlight the importantce of protecting our voting system.”

Martin did not impugn nor question the integrity of voters. He questioned the integrity of voter rolls.

Words mean things. It’s sad to see professional journalists–or bloggers who blog for newspaper Web sites–show the same precision with words as you normally get out of Nigerians writing e-mails in an Internet cafe in Lagos.

Buy My Books!
Buy John Donnelly's Gold Buy The Courtship of Barbara Holt Buy Coffee House Memories

Book Report: Double Crossfire: The Executioner #40 by “Don Pendleton” (1982)

After the consortium began producing these books, it moved from a mob-centric plot to an international terrorist plot template. After all, the 1970s were over and the 1980s were beginning. Out with the Dirty Harry, in with the Rambo.

In this book, Mack Bolan is out to protect America from heroin coming from Turkey. The KGB and its mercenaries are using a guerrilla front group to grow and process opium. The KGB also has designs to encourage an Armenian-American to fund and front an Armenian rebel group so it can thwart the Armenian-American and publicly embarrass America and to drive Turkey into the Russian sphere of influence. To save the day, Bolan has to protect the Armenian-American from a mob-like hit in Beverly Hills and then to air drop into Turkey to rescue Americans and an attractive Kurdish woman and to blow up the operation.

As the book turns from the mob focus to the world focus, it does broaden the possibilities. It also leads to more complex plots and lenghtening books. If that’s what you’re looking for, you’ll be pleased that it’s more modern thrillerish. The end of the book features a number of cables coming in that tip you to the next several books available in the sundry series in the Mack Bolan world. I dunno. I’m probably romanticizing it in thinking there’s as much lost as gained in the transition.

Books mentioned in this review:

Buy My Books!
Buy John Donnelly's Gold Buy The Courtship of Barbara Holt Buy Coffee House Memories

Book Report: Satan’s Sabbath: The Executioner #38 by Don Pendleton (1980)

This book is the last one written by Don Pendleton before he turned the series over to The Executioner, Inc., and they turned out hundreds of books in the series and others. As such, it does have an ending sort of feel to it as Pendelton finishes up with the War on the Mafia that covered the first books in the series.

As in Friday’s Feast, this book picks up on the final one week swing through the country that Mack Bolan takes after accepting a job working for Washington. It’s probably best if you not reflect on how Bolan can drive across country in a week while stopping and infiltrating and exterminating various mob bastions while doing so.

This time, he returns to New York to finish off the remainder of the families there who are reorganizing after his previous visit. It’s a pretty standard piece of Bolan fare with a couple of ambushes and set pieces where Bolan turns a bordello and Central Park into a hellground and then he infiltrates the mafia HQ using the same Omega/Frankie/Ace of Spades schtick. I don’t mean to diminish it too much, since I’m learning how relatively good the Bolan books are in the monthly pulp paperback line, but if you read them too quickly, you see they are very similar. That’s part of the comfort and the lure of them, I guess. They are put out by the Harlequin people, for crying out loud.

Books mentioned in this review:

Buy My Books!
Buy John Donnelly's Gold Buy The Courtship of Barbara Holt Buy Coffee House Memories

Another Trailer Booed

My wife and I attended the cinema this week, and we saw the action film Red.

Because it’s almost the same thing, really, someone with the theater chain or studios determined it would be a good idea to run the trailer for the Valerie Plame fiction (inspired by true events, where the “events” are emotional outbursts of the left).

I booed it, of course.

Here is Kyle Smith’s review, which is also a boo of sorts.

Anyone want to guess the Box Office on this one? I go with $7 million total. Unexpectedly, the American people won’t understand the message and genius of the film that’s for their own good.

(Link seen on Big Hollywood.)

Buy My Books!
Buy John Donnelly's Gold Buy The Courtship of Barbara Holt Buy Coffee House Memories

Book Report: Motherhood, The Second Oldest Profession by Erma Bombeck (1983)

After reading Fatherhood by Bill Cosby, I looked for another book of short pieces to keep on the bedstand. I inherited a number of Erma Bombeck titles from my mother, so I chose one of them. I wondered why Erma Bombeck doesn’t get much acclaim or even mention only a decade after her death and why I lump Bill Cosby in with Mark Twain as a great American humorist, but Erma Bombeck doesn’t percolate up to collective memory. Well, this book explained it.

It’s an amusing collection, but Erma Bombeck was a suburban housewife whose great success came writing newspaper columns in the 1970s and 1980s. Her columns in this book really tie themselves to that era and concern, so I cannot relate to them with the depth that I can to Bill Cosby or even to Andy Rooney. Sadly.

This is not my first trip through some of Bombeck’s works. I read some of them, perhaps even the same volumes, when I was in middle school and maybe early high school since my mother had them around and I didn’t have a library of several thousand volumes to read through at that time. Did I say middle school? I might have read some of them as early as elementary school, since it might have been before I moved to Missouri for the first time.

I remember one of the columns from this book, a column about a mother who died at 48 and left each of three boys a letter that said, “Don’t tell your brothers, but I loved you the best.” When I first read it, I had a mother. Now I have my mother’s book. There’s something poignant, self-consciously so, in that. One of the late of-the-cuff remarks in this book, about mothers who throw out their right arms when they step hard on the brakes, struck me. I’d teased my mother about that when she did that to me into my 30s, as though her thin arm was going to save me. But it’s an impulse many mothers who grew up in the era before mandatory seat belts and rear car seats must have had. It will be meaningless to kids these days, but I remembered it well, the karate chop to the chest in a tense automotive situation.

Will you like this book? Probably more if you’re over the age of 35 and can see your mother in it or see yourself in it if you’re over 60. Kids today and adults in the future will look at the sitatutions therein as though they were reading “The Celebrated Jumping Frog of Calaveras County.” So maybe someday she’ll be something of Mark Twain. But probably not, as humor columnists fall out of favor and are forgotten.

Books mentioned in this review:

Motherhood: The Second Oldest Profession

Buy My Books!
Buy John Donnelly's Gold Buy The Courtship of Barbara Holt Buy Coffee House Memories

One Less Temptation On Bag Day

Curse that volunteer’s sharp eyes:

The value of a box of old books donated to the Friends of the Library book sale can’t be measured just in dollars.

The box contained an eight-volume collection of Shakespeare’s works by Lewis Theobald printed in 1773 and a volume of the Bard’s poetry published by John Bell one year later. The books were part of an effort to rehabilitate William Shakespeare’s image.

Heck, I would have paid $2 each for them.

Buy My Books!
Buy John Donnelly's Gold Buy The Courtship of Barbara Holt Buy Coffee House Memories

The Efficacy of Security Cameras As Crime Prevention Tools Explained

This story shows how effective security cameras are at preventing crime:

The incident began around 1:30 a.m. Monday, when police say Aberle is pictured in security footage trying to break through a glass window on the north side of the building.

According to court documents, she is seen knocking over a trash can and then throwing trash against the window.

“During this time, Khelawan enters and is posing for the camera while Aberle continues to try to break the glass by throwing a landscaping rock against the glass,” the probable cause statement says.

The glass shattered after about 10 minutes of effort, the statement said.

Then, around 2:30 a.m, a vehicle rams the glass entry doors on the northwest end of the building. Aberle and Khelawan are seen getting out of the car and walking into the school, where they knock over trash cans and kick a glass display case, according to court documents.

No damage to the interior of the school was reported.

Half an hour later, the two are seen on surveillance footage walking from the building, officers said.

The vehicle is seen about 10 minutes later, ramming the glass entry doors on the north side of the building, but no one enters the school. The car is then seen on security footage cutting doughnuts in the grassy area north of the school, court documents said.

The school resource officer responding to the interior alarms at the school told Springfield police she encountered the two on the west parking lot of the school around 3:20 a.m.

The cameras have almost two hours of footage of the vandalism, including one of the alleged perpetrators mugging for the camera. Then, almost two hours later, a single cop shows up in response to the alarms.

Again, cameras save the day.

Buy My Books!
Buy John Donnelly's Gold Buy The Courtship of Barbara Holt Buy Coffee House Memories

A Basic Misunderstanding

AP headlines GOP victories move nation to right.

The article itself gives the president plenty of quotage from his news conference yesterday wherein he explains away the misunderstandings and ignorance of the populace that serves him and its recent errors in the election. The article then gives the Republicans a couple of quotes to respond.

However, whoever wrote that headline happily conflates country with government. The elections did not move the country. The country used the elections to move the government to the right. More aligned with the country’s beliefs than the government proved to be in the years 2007-2010, most particularly in the years 2009-2010 where the Democratic Party held the legislature and the executive.

Buy My Books!
Buy John Donnelly's Gold Buy The Courtship of Barbara Holt Buy Coffee House Memories

What Is In Brian’s Junk Drawer? Part 1 of a Continuing Series

I had reason to tear into my junk drawers yesterday, the off-to-the-side desk drawers into which I dump old pens and miscellany. I don’t actually open those drawers for months at a time, much less root through them. Most of them are intact from the move from Old Trees to Nogglestead just over a year ago.

However, last night, I tore through them looking for a long unused thumb drive that I thought my wife wanted in an emergency manner, and I uncovered many things that require explanation. And some that defy any.

Like a single post-it note, folded in half so the sticky top is stuck to the bottom of the back. On the sticky note, three names in my handwriting in red pen: Jim Belushi, Juaquin (sic) Phoenix, and Mark Wahlberg.

I cannot think of a thing that unites these particular stars. Maybe three stars who surpassed their older brothers?

I don’t see anything on the blog about them. Of course, if I looked now, I would.

Were I to actually continue this series, I would be able to explain most of the random oddities in the junk drawer, unlike the oddities I find in my work bench.

Buy My Books!
Buy John Donnelly's Gold Buy The Courtship of Barbara Holt Buy Coffee House Memories

Book Report: Rustic Reminders of the Past by Leo Hamblet (?)

I bought this book at a book fair down here, and I hoped it would do dual duty:

  • I wanted something easy to flip through during a football game.
  • I hoped to find some linear drawings to turn into wood burnings.

Well, I got one of the two, that being the first.

It’s a small, self-published collection of drawings produced by Mr. Hamblet during his drives and meanderings in Oklahoma and Western Arkansas. The images focus on rural buildings, barns and whatnot, with landscape around them. No people or horses. Mr. Hamblet demonstrates some talent with the pen.

Unfortunately, as far as the wood burning goes, the images are a little too busy for me, with a lot of pen strokes and detailed lines. I’m still at the clip art difficulty level when it comes to wood burning.

Since it’s not available on Amazon.com nor other bookselling Web sites, I’ve included the cover here so you don’t think I’m completely making it up:

Buy My Books!
Buy John Donnelly's Gold Buy The Courtship of Barbara Holt Buy Coffee House Memories

So What Is Missouri Constitutional Amendment #1?

Downstate here, we have not seen any sort of advertising or much explanation of Missouri Constitutional Amendment #1, so voters are a little unclear on it. Let me do my best in layman’s terms to talk about it, and take the explanation with a grain of salt.

Here is the text:

Official Ballot Title:

Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended to require the office of county assessor to be an elected position in all counties with a charter form of government, except counties with a population between 600,001-699,999?

It is estimated this proposal will have no costs or savings to state or local governmental entities.

Fair Ballot Language:

A “yes” vote will amend the Missouri Constitution to require that assessors in charter counties be elected officers. This proposal will affect St. Louis County and any county that adopts a charter form of government. The exception is for a county that has between 600,001-699,999 residents, which currently is only Jackson County.

A “no” vote will not change the current requirement for charter counties.

If passed, this measure will not have an impact on taxes.

Ultimately, this is the Let St. Louis County Elect Its Assessor Amendment. The Moberly Monitor-Index explains different sizes of counties and the meaning of charter government. Of the charter governments, St. Louis County (which does not include the city of St. Louis due to some poor planning on the city’s part over 100 years ago) does not elect its assessor.

In recent years, the assessed value of properties in St. Louis County has continued to chug upwards, with some properties going up as much as 20% in a single year for no apparent reason. The assessor’s office has also used unpopular drive-by assessments, where assessors don’t spend much time evaluating the properties under “scrutiny.”

St. Louis County citizens want more accountability in the assessor’s office. Currently, it’s an appointed position. Residents hope that making it an elected position will make the assessor more responsive to citizens’ concerns and perhaps less apt to raise assessments in down years and stagnant real estate markets.

You might say, “Gee, Brian, you’re against top-down solutions, so certainly you’re against this.” However, this is a top-down solution that increases electoral accountability, so I’m for it. Until recently, I lived in St. Louis County (and I still have property there, so although I cannot vote, I will be impacted by the decision), and I know how concerned citizens there are about this issue. Even as the Tea Party was ramping up, this issue engaged citizens independently.

A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, and Hallowe’en is over.

(Cross-posted to 24th State.)

Buy My Books!
Buy John Donnelly's Gold Buy The Courtship of Barbara Holt Buy Coffee House Memories

A Startling Breakthrough

In an innovative line of thought, unheard of in modern times and perhaps left behind by the mysterious alien intelligences that built the pyramids and the nature-loving primitive people who built Stonehenge, a concerned group of government tag-alongs has come up with a plan to add jobs: spend government money.

A group of people concerned about the lack of economic development and jobs on the north and west sides of Milwaukee have put together a plan they are convinced would make a difference.

Now, they just need the city, county, state and banks to go along with them – to the tune of $400 million.

So what’s the plan? According to Edward McDonald, the University of Wisconsin Extension agent who drafted it, the proposal involves designating a wide area of the central city – from W. Burleigh St. to W. Highland Ave. and from the Milwaukee River to N. 60th St. – for improvement.

It would set up a community council to oversee the project, and have the council develop catalyst projects, already designated by city planners, that would spur adjacent development.

Money would somehow be cobbled together from existing government funds and bank loans, encouraged by government deposits. It would be spent over four years.

The plan? Spend $100,000,000 a year funding council to develop buzzword buzzword buzzword. Exclamation point!

God-luv-em, they are so earnest.

Call it the no government tag-along left behind act. But don’t call it “stimulus” because that buzzword no longer focus groups well.

Buy My Books!
Buy John Donnelly's Gold Buy The Courtship of Barbara Holt Buy Coffee House Memories

A Conservative Argument Against Constitutional Amendment 3 and Proposition A

As I have said before, I’m a good conservative who does not like taxes. However, these two ballot measures are not simple votes against taxes. Instead, both are top down (or at least middle-down) prohibitions that limit the choices cities, towns, and other municipalities can make to fund their priorities and prevent voters from making revenue decisions in the future.

The text of Constitutional Amendment 3 is:

Official Ballot Title:

Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended to prevent the state, counties, and other political subdivisions from imposing any new tax, including a sales tax, on the sale or transfer of homes or any other real estate?

It is estimated this proposal will have no costs or savings to state or local governmental entities.

Fair Ballot Language:

A “yes” vote will amend the Missouri Constitution to prevent the state, counties, and other political subdivisions from imposing any new tax, including a sales tax, on the sale or transfer of homes or any other real estate.

A “no” vote will not change the Missouri Constitution to prevent the state, counties, and other political subdivisions from imposing a new tax on the sale or transfer of homes or any other real estate.

If passed, this measure will have no impact on taxes.

Basically, it Constitutionally prevents municipalities from imposing taxes on real estate transfers. That is, it prevents additional sales taxes that hit you when you buy your home (or when you sell your home, depending upon your negotiating acumen). Realtors love this because it lowers the actual costs involved with selling a house or piece of land, but ultimately, it’s not a big concern. Meanwhile, cities, states, and municipalities still get thousands of dollars of taxes on houses every year, with the exact percentage of each assessed value creeping up every ballot and the assessed value creeping up pretty much annually.

The text of Proposition A is:

Official Ballot Title:

Shall Missouri law be amended to:

* repeal the authority of certain cities to use earnings taxes to fund their budgets;
* require voters in cities that currently have an earnings tax to approve continuation of such tax at the next general municipal election and at an election held every 5 years thereafter;
* require any current earnings tax that is not approved by the voters to be phased out over a period of 10 years; and
* prohibit any city from adding a new earnings tax to fund their budget?

The proposal could eliminate certain city earnings taxes. For 2010, Kansas City and the City of St. Louis budgeted earnings tax revenue of $199.2 million and $141.2 million, respectively. Reduced earnings tax deductions could increase state revenues by $4.8 million. The total cost or savings to state and local governmental entities is unknown.

Fair Ballot Language:

A “yes” vote will amend Missouri law to repeal the authority of certain cities to use earnings taxes to fund their budgets. The amendment further requires voters in cities that currently have an earnings tax, St. Louis and Kansas City, to approve continuation of such tax at the next general municipal election and at an election held every five years or to phase out the tax over a period of ten years.

A “no” vote will not change the current Missouri law regarding earnings taxes.

If passed, this measure will impact taxes by removing the ability of cities to fund their budgets through earnings taxes. The only exception is that voters in cities that currently have an earnings tax may vote to continue such taxes.

Again, my main sticking point with this amendment is that it absolutely prohibits cities and municipalities from using an earnings tax. I favor forcing voters to reapprove these taxes periodically and favor lower taxes generally, but if the remaining residents of the city of St. Louis want to continue to pay 1% viggorish and to compel employees of companies that are located in the city due mainly to the complex web of incentive packages that lure and retain businesses to a decidedly unbusiness friendly environment so that the city can continue to pay mortgages on failed public-private development deals, to offer unaccredited schooling, and to provide lunar landscape simulators instead of streets, that’s up to voters in the city of St. Louis.

Both of these initiatives bring two conservative principles into conflict: lower taxes versus power pushed to lower levels of government.

Proponents seem to base these blanket prohibitions merely on the principle that We Don’t Like Taxes, a principle that could yield similar initiatives to ban other revenue types like parking meters, home occupancy inspection fees, and sales taxes on food. As principles go, it’s not a firm foundation for these measures, and the principle of allowing local governments to make their own revenue decisions and to thereby somewhat compete and test ideas independently should trump it.

Proponents like to say that the measures give the voters the chance to decide. No, each gives voters one single vote one time to make a decision that will render city, state, and municipal governments impotent into perpetuity to use these types of taxes. They do not give future voters the chance to decide based on community needs 20 years fom now.

Tomorrow, I’m voting no on both measures.

(Cross-posted at 24th State.)

Buy My Books!
Buy John Donnelly's Gold Buy The Courtship of Barbara Holt Buy Coffee House Memories

Writing in the Winterlands

Tam encounters northern atmosphere:

When it’s sunny, I feel the urge to live deliberately, like Thoreau, but with dachshunds instead of ants. When the clouds and drizzle come, I instead feel the urge to write about shoggoths shambling about in pet semetaries.

Strangely, my most productive writing period meshes with the time I spent amongst my hearty northern clan, before I moved amongst the luxurious and decadent southern tribes and became soft.

Buy My Books!
Buy John Donnelly's Gold Buy The Courtship of Barbara Holt Buy Coffee House Memories

A Conservative Argument Against Constitutional Amendment #2

The text of Missouri Constitutional Amendment #2 on the November ballot is:

Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended to require that all real property used as a homestead by Missouri citizens who are former prisoners of war and have a total service-connected disability be exempt from property taxes?

The number of qualified former prisoners of war and the amount of each exemption are unknown, however, because the number who meet the qualifications is expected to be small, the cost to local governmental entities should be minimal. Revenue to the state blind pension fund may be reduced by $1,200.

As a conservative, I both love lower taxes and respect veterans who have served the country. However, I don’t favor extending tax relief to special classes who are more beloved of the majority of voters, legislators, or petition signers.

What, exactly, is the principle involved here? The former POWs served the country, so they should not pay property taxes on their primary homes? What about other disabled veterans? Why are they not special enough? Or law enforcement and fire fighting personnel? And volunteer firefighters. And teachers! We all love and respect teachers. Clerks at the Revenue License Offices? And so on.

I favor lower taxes for everyone, not just limited subsets of people who behave according to government favor.

(Cross-posted at 24th State.)

Buy My Books!
Buy John Donnelly's Gold Buy The Courtship of Barbara Holt Buy Coffee House Memories

Oh, I’m The Extremist?

Say you think the United States Department of Education, younger than I am and I’mnotthatolddammit, is worth reconsideration as a Federal level institution and drain of Chinese bond purchaser dollars makes me an EXTREMIST?

But, somehow, you think it’s worthwhile that those same dollars go to fund grants that do SUCH IMPORTANT WORK as billboards:

Ready to Spend grant
Click for fully funded Federal glory

You know what? I call defending the United States Department of Education Office of Innovation and Improvement Ready to Learn Grant billboards that replace privately funded “Don’t Suck Out That Growth In Your Uterus” billboards EXTREMIST.

I mean, seriously. We’re spending Chinese dollars and bringing wrack upon our economy to innovatively put up billboards telling parents to read to their children? Palin have mercy.

Buy My Books!
Buy John Donnelly's Gold Buy The Courtship of Barbara Holt Buy Coffee House Memories

Book Report: Borrowed Ideas and Famous Firsts: St. Louis Architecture by Marilynne Bradley and Ahme Quist (1984)

This is a very short booklet about some architectural landmarks in the St. Louis area. Short paragraphs about each landmark accompany a photograph or a drawing of the landmark in question. Ms. Bradley does the photos and drawings.

As some of you might remember, I bought Ms. Bradley’s book of watercolors in 2008. Given that the books are 24 years apart, she’s maintained her interest in the architecture of the St. Louis area for a long time.

It’s an interesting little book to browse (you can easily do it between football plays on television) if you have interest in the St. Louis area and its history or architecture at all.

Books mentioned in this review:

Buy My Books!
Buy John Donnelly's Gold Buy The Courtship of Barbara Holt Buy Coffee House Memories