MSNBC is running a story entitled “What $87 Billion Buys: Instead of a war in Iraq, here’s what America could be getting for its money”. In this remarkable (as I am remarking on’t, werd) piece (of something), the author puts together a list of bullet points that describe things the government could do with $87 billion dollars instead of spending it rebuilding Iraq. In between lists, he inserts some snarky quotes by grabby people who haven’t quite gotten their hands full of your money on their pet projects yet.
Basically, Jonathan Darman, author of this Web Exclusive! says the United States Government could, and should, take that $87 billion dollars and:
- Hire millions more bureaucrats which would then need $87 billion dollars plus cost of living adjustments every
year from this day forward, or - Pour millions into the budgets of petty bureaucracies, who know they have to spend the money if they want to get
it next year, which again means $87 billion dollars a year plus 8- or 10-percent annual increases forever.
The author of the piece obviously attended the remedial mathematical classes required to get a Poli-Sci degree along with our distinguished Congresspeople who have the motto if we have a dollar, we should rent something that costs a dollar a month forever.
(Link seen on Little Green Footballs.)
