In the Friday mailbag today at Founding Questions, someone asked:
Re: The meme (for lack of a better term): “The world stopped in 1999, and this is a simulation (or whatever).” Question: In your opinion: How much of the slowdown in culture, etc, is due to the Boomers losing their juice? Be it personally, physically, socially, and so on? How much of the meme is simply trolling people wth fuzzy memories? And how much is Religion (big R) going away, and the search for meaning spilling over to any nook or cranny?
I have given this some thought, gentle reader, and I attribute it to the decline of the educational establishments in the country, whether it’s the consolidation of school districts to solve problems Horace Mann identified in 19th century (spoiler alert: they did not, in fact, solve the problems, but they sure made room for a lot of administrators) or the change in the nature of colleges (now universities). Heck, maybe it was the electrification of the country, where culture shifted to radio and later television (and, in some places, but not all, movies).
So the depth of the source material from which creators and writers decreased. Instead of imaginative books or even radio, writers and whatnot started taking their main inputs from visual media, and you can see it in their outputs.
Now, we’ve reached a point where young creators and writers have taken their inputs mostly from movies. For example, this PJ Media column alludes:
Enter the Donkey version of Loki, the deeply duplicitous trickster-villain from the Marvel Cinematic Universe….
Not the Norse god of lies. Not the comic book villain for almost 70 years now. No, the Loki from a contemporary series of movies (no, man, Thor was 2011, which is like fifteen years ago–it’s an old movie).
If you read widely, historically speaking, you’ll find that even pulp (the best of it) from the early 20th century has depth that a lot of contemporary mass culture (movies, mostly, but also television) lacks. Classical allusions, retelling of stories, maybe just hitting most of the Hero’s Journey, for crying out loud. But the new films are trying to retell the older (not necessarily old) films. Why do later Star Wars movies merely thinly retell the original Star Wars movies? Because the filmmakers’ inputs were not classical serials but the original Star Wars movies (a thinner source from which to draw). You can apply this to other “franchises” which just retread and message-swap the stories.
Now, this might apply less to writers, who tend to start out readers and who might have some depth in their inputs, but I assure you this does not necessarily apply to poets as some of my book reports suggest.
Where are we going to be in twenty years when the prime creators grew up on Twitter, Instagram, and TikTok? Me, I’ll be reading old books, same as ever. As a culture: Can it really get any worse?
So what is to be done? I dunno. Read a book? Write something more than twee blog posts? Probably more advice to me than many of you.



After watching 

I mentioned Woz in a
Well, as I mentioned 

Deadpool, as a character, came at the end of my new comic buying period (that is, I went to college and stopped buying them whenever I came up with a buck and they had new titles at the drugstores as they did in those days). I know, I know; I’ve been known to go to the comic book shop in the last decade and pick up a run or two of Dynamite titles, mostly revamped old properties like Conan or Red Sonja or whatever. Also, he came out in the mutant books, the X-Men and all their spinoffs, and those were not my first choice amongst the new titles–I preferred Spider-Man, Captain America, Wonder-Man, Quasar, and the Avengers over the X-everythings which I found to be too soap-opery.
You know, I suppose I could have read this book last year, when I was on a bit of a Hiaasen-clearing mood (when I read
I can’t actually tell you when I bought this book from ABC Books, as it does not show up in a Good Book Hunting post via a quick search, but it would have been shelved right above the martial arts section when they had one (the last time I was in, they did not have a martial arts section, which was empty most of the time anyway). They must have thought a lot about this book, as it is wrapped in a mylar cover, but one of the things I noticed about it very early was the poor paper quality. It’s yellowed and its luminosity has dimmed–I would have thought I was reading a 1960s paperback instead of a hardback that’s under 20 years old.



This is one of John D. MacDonald’s science fantasy books–The Ballroom of the Skies being the other, which I just read
It’s funny: I have several Steve Martin movies atop my fresh media cabinet, including The Pink Panther, Bringing Down The House, The Shop Girl, and probably a couple of others (although not 
So I got this book in a roundabout fashion: As part of the stocking stuffers for Christmas 2023, I bought the family Barnes and Noble gift cards, which I failed to stuff in their stockings in 2023 (they were full enough anyway), so I put them in the stockings for Christmas 2024 (where the stockings were less stuffed, so the deferred giving worked out better than it might have). My beautiful wife knew that this book was coming out this year (although the copyright date is 2024, it was not in book stores until February 2025). She read it right away–ah, gentle reader, I remember a time when I would buy a book by an author the day it came out and read it that night, but we are too far in the 21st century for me to do that much any more. After she read it, she put it into my office, and I put it in my unread stacks until after the 2025 Winter Reading Challenge. And, amazingly, I found it again shortly thereafter, so I picked it up.