Convenient Technicalities

Ballot proposals rejected by Carnahan:

The November ballot in Missouri won’t be quite as crowded after Secretary of State Robin Carnahan announced Thursday that two proposals can’t go before voters because of faulty petitions.

Carnahan tossed out proposed state constitutional amendments to limit the use of eminent domain and to restrict state spending. She cited technical problems with the petitions, each signed by about 200,000 registered voters, and an inaccurate financial summary attached to the eminent domain petitions.

Never fear, gentle reader, the spokespeople are out to assuage your fears:

Carnahan spokeswoman Stacie Temple said the decision to toss out the petitions was based solely on law, not Carnahan’s personal or political views.

How convenient that Carnahan tossed out government-limiting ballot initiatives that would cap state spending and limit eminent domain, but that the following ballot measures–sometimes whose petitions were circulated by the same people as the aforementioned rejected petitions–are still on the ballot:

I’m sure that the two conservative ballot items were removed for valid legal reasons. I also think we have too many technicalities and byzantine legalities from which a determined public servant can pick and choose to advance his or her own agendum within the nebulous framework afforded by an inattentive constituency.

Buy My Books!
Buy John Donnelly's Gold Buy The Courtship of Barbara Holt Buy Coffee House Memories

4 thoughts on “Convenient Technicalities

  1. Robin Carnahan, such a sweet little flower. I wonder who thought up the excuses for her?

  2. Glad to see dynastic nepotism’s alive and well in Missouri. I’m assuming little Robin is the spawn of Jean and Mel?

  3. Brian:
    I am with you. Here in Pennsylvania ( and probably many other states), the pols schedule referendums (some are for hundreds of millions) for primary elections when less than 10% of the eligible voters even bother to vote.

    It’s disgusting that they are now using this new tactic of referendums to excite their bases to vote.

Comments are closed.